Surprise: ‘Socialist’ not actually a name for someone pushing Socialism – instead, it’s code for ‘Black’

So Obama says he wants to ‘Spread the Wealth around’. But people calling him a socialist are doing it because its code for black…

Yeah. Sure it is.

Senate Majority Leader – Connecting Fannie Mae Exec to Obama is Racism

Never-mind logic.

Might as well assume any criticism of The One is Racism. Connecting Obama with Ayers was already counted as racism…because, you know – Ayers is white…

Barney Frank deemed criticism of giving loans to people with no means of repaying them as Racism.

I’ve already written about this pathetic labeling at great length. This looser tactic is for intellectual cowards that can’t mount a good argument or maintain a rational discussion. Real thinkers actually reply to accusations with facts and information – rather than name-calling like two-year-olds.

Click image to listen (BTW -The claim of ‘no connection’ is a total lie, for the record.):

This just in – Comparing Harry Reid to Baby Jar-Jar Binks is racist.

…and agist.

What exactly does ‘party of opportunity’ mean? Not ‘white’ I guess.

“If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican party.”

I guess Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Clarence Thomas, Larry Elder, Michael Steele, etc…just don’t count. And spare me the ‘party of opportunity’ and ‘inclusive accepting party’ hogwash. The parties have nothing to do with race, ethnicity, or sex. They are about different values and views on personal liberty and government.

Unless, of course – by ‘opportunity’ Dean means affirmative action which is essentially inverted racism against the majority…